In OF THE NECESSITY OF THE WAGER, Pascal
persisted in a question, “Why am I so limited? ” And he described the condition
of men as such an image, “ A number of men in chains, and all condemned to
death, where some are killed each day in the sight of the others, and those who
remain see their own fate in that of their fellows, and wait their turn,
looking at each other sorrowfully and without hope.”
It’s different
from the ordinary impression of scientists living in the year of Enlightenment.
He seemed to be very anxious about the fact that human beings are not immortal.
This kind of fear even destroyed his interest in this life. This might
because he was a scientist, and what he feared of is not the death, or the pain we would suffer in hell, but the
unknown.
According to Pascal, here might be two preconditions. Self-realization
is the basis of individual happiness and the cognition of the outside world. At
the same time, as a part of human dignity, rationality drives people to seek
for the ultimate truth while it serves as the most reliable cognition method. People
in Pascal’s age believed that they should and could find out the truth. According
to the science revolution, they did make it partially. However, the more they
discovered, the more astonished we are at the limitlessness of the world, and
we inevitably realized the limit imposed on us, even when it came to rationality
itself. It aggravated the everlasting doubt whether we can even realize
ourselves. What have been mentioned above may lead to a dangerous conclusion:
rationality could lead us nowhere, and our development, our dignity, may be
nothing. “Being independent” is just a dream. We are still the slaves of
something unknown.
This is why Pascal chose to believe in the existence of God. Although he
was a Christian, his definition of God is not confined to the Christian
conception. It is more like a symbol of an ultimate answer, and his explanation
can be put on Allah, the Buddha, and any other god living in the legends. What
leads him to the God may simply be the habit or tradition of culture. He didn’t
care what the God is. The only thing he needed to secure is that there IS an
answer. Then he could continue his pursuit of it with the confidence that what
he did was not in vain.
His
insistence that God exists doesn’t conflict with reason, and in fact he was not
alone. For example, all the American astronauts landing on the moon finally devoted
themselves to religion. You have been on the moon. Then what else has meaning
to you? What are you to this vast universe? Does our science have any meaning
when the world is so limitless? When they stood on the moon, the astonishment
dominating them may be the same as what Pascal felt when he was faced with the
mystery of nature, even the development of science has gone to a different
level. And maybe we cannot escape from this kind of fear.
No comments:
Post a Comment